To: dead
Also, I must point out that the damage done to the economy by such terrorists acts.
Also, the deficit must be viewed as a % of GDP. Which, is not at an all time high.
If you guys can't follow this, I can give you a primer.
I'm sorry you ladies are pissed the GWB isn't running the country to your specifications. Want me to call Whine-1-1?
To: Lance Romance
Tax cuts without fiscal restraint are meaningless and have virtualy been removed by the massive addition to the defecit. At some point that money has to be paid back.
The govt is not the economy. GWB, for all his pluses when it comes to defense of the nation, has been an utter failure when it comes to fiscal matters. Stell tariffs, farm bills, NCLB, prescription drugs. This isn't LBJ or FDR in office, or is it?
To: Lance Romance
Geez, you're the whiniest girl on this thread, and you accuse others of whining!?!
Got a little sand in your panties, I guess.
43 posted on
01/05/2004 2:08:12 PM PST by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: Lance Romance
Bush's spending as a percentage of the GDP is lower than both Reagan's and Bush I, and only slightly higher than Clinton's cut-the-military to shreds budget.
Yet, none of them had to deal with a major attack on the U.S. mainland, and the economic aftermath of 9/11.
51 posted on
01/05/2004 2:15:59 PM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson