Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terror plot to attack US with BA jets
The Sunday Times (UK) ^ | 1/04/03 | Davis Leppard

Posted on 01/03/2004 4:35:03 PM PST by saquin

An Al-Qaeda suicide plot to hijack several passenger jets simultaneously — including a British Airways flight — and crash them into high-profile American targets has been uncovered by the security services.

The American capital and nuclear power stations on the country’s East Coast are said to have been among the terrorists’ potential targets.

The September 11-style plot explains the grounding of 10 US-bound flights across the world over the seasonal break.

According to a senior intelligence source, an informant tipped off authorities the weekend before Christmas. He claimed that Islamic extremists intended to hijack flights operated by BA, Air France and AeroMexico, the Mexican national carrier.

The informant said that as well as targeting Washington, New York and Los Angeles, the terrorists were planning to launch a strike on an oil terminal in Alaska. A CIA assessment of his information subsequently identified nuclear plants on the eastern coast of America as possible targets.

Detailed security checks were conducted on all US-bound flights operated by the three carriers after the intelligence emerged about the alleged plot. All passenger lists were cross-checked against an FBI watchlist of known terrorist suspects.

As a result, 10 US-bound flights were grounded: two BA flights to Washington, two AeroMexico flights from Mexico City to LA and six Air France flights from Paris to LA. At least three other flights were escorted into American airports by F-16 fighter jets and one Mexican airliner was even forced to turn back in mid-air.

BA also grounded two flights to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, which were due to fly on New Year’s Eve and yesterday afternoon. It is understood that these cancellations related to separate intelligence.

Although flight 223, BA’s service to Washington, was cleared by British officials for take-off yesterday afternoon after being cancelled for two days running, the United States was still not satisfied, leaving it delayed on the runway for 3½ hours while the 225 passengers were subjected to additional questioning on board.

The aircraft eventually took off at 6.30pm and was due to arrive at Washington Dulles airport at 2.10am today.

Intelligence sources yesterday confirmed that the cancellation of the US-bound services was triggered by information provided by an informant “outside the US”. The warning was of an imminent attack on American soil with Washington, Los Angeles and New York identified as targets.

It is thought that another target was the Alaskan port of Valdez, the terminal for an 800-mile pipeline which carries 17% of America’s domestic oil supply. The informant also named specific routes and flight numbers, including BA223, as part of the hijack plot. It is understood that intercepts of communications between known terrorist suspects also suggested the significant risk of an attack.

On the same weekend that the intelligence was received from the informant, Tom Ridge, the US homeland security secretary, raised the security threat for US citizens to “code orange”, the second highest level. He said that the country faced the risk of a terror strike which “could either rival or exceed” September 11.

All passenger lists on the jets believed to be potential targets were checked. Valdez was put on high alert and the transfer of oil to tankers was suspended. Some passengers listed on Air France flights to LA appeared to match suspects on the terror watchlist and six flights were cancelled on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day. One passenger who had a similar name to a Tunisian terrorist turned out to be a five-year-old child.

French security officials insisted that the decision to ground the planes was taken on the basis of “significant intelligence”. One of the passengers who failed to turn up was a trained pilot from the Middle East who has since disappeared and cannot be traced, according to US intelligence sources.

Checks on the British passenger lists revealed other apparent matches with names on the terror watchlist, but none is thought to have been confirmed.

Spurious matches are not uncommon because of the similarity of many Arabic names. As well as checks on specific aircraft, new security measures were implemented. The British government said last Sunday that armed air marshals would be deployed on US-bound flights where needed.

David Blunkett, the home secretary, wants to hold an urgent meeting of the British and American “contact group”, which contains security and intelligence officials, police and politicians from the two countries.

There are signs of tension between London and Washington over the extent to which Britain follows every command from the United States after terror alerts. “The notion that the US can bounce the rest of us into cancelling flights all the time needs to be addressed,” said one British minister.

Yesterday passengers checking in for BA flight 223 to Washington Dulles airport said that they were not deterred by the security alert surrounding the service.

Ralph Hodgson, 58, a businessman from Newcastle, said: “I’ve absolutely no worries at all about getting on this flight. I think if anything’s going to happen, if your number’s called, then your number’s going to be called.”

In a separate security alert BA’s flight to Riyadh was cancelled for the second time in four days after intelligence reports relating to a potential surface-to-air missile attack on a British carrier.

This weekend government officials were believed to be advising the Saudi authorities on measures to improve ground security at Riyadh airport.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; ba; ba223; iad; lax; lhr; oil; oilterminals; terrorism; valdez
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last
To: Damagro
We still don't know what happened with that 727 that disappeared in Africa last year

The 727s have been workhorses for illegal activities. .

Instead of stopping at Mexico they could keep going with 6 tons of munitions. I am sure our Govt. is aware of this. -Tom

Old Jets Used to Smuggle Cocaine to United States DRUG TRAFFICKING February 1995

According to government sources in the United States and Mexico, Colombian drug smugglers have been using old 727's to fly cocaine into Mexico to be smuggled later into the US (Tim Golden, "Tons of Cocaine Reaching Mexico in Old Jets," New York Times, Jan. 10, 1995, p. A1).

The sources report that smugglers buy the jets, remove the seats, and attempt to fly six tons of cocaine or more to Mexico on each flight. Each load of cocaine can be worth as much as $120 million on the street in the U.S.

The jets travel virtually undetected because they usually travel at night with their lights and radar transponder equipment turned off. The traffickers alter the plane's identification numbers and do not file flight plans.

Most notably, the planes fly at higher speeds than other aircraft, outrunning drug enforcement jets. Even when Mexican drug enforcement officials do catch the planes, traffickers often abandon them on airstrips because they are relatively cheap to replace.

81 posted on 01/03/2004 7:53:08 PM PST by Capt. Tom (Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb republicans. - Capt. Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: saquin
BTTT for later
82 posted on 01/03/2004 7:56:03 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma (Support Free Republic! End the Freepathons! I have SEWING to do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
I wonder who this British minister is and if he seriously questions the United States' right to control its own airspace?
The left, as usual, has a lot o blame in this. Their constant beloittling and attacks of President Bush has led officials in other countries to jump onto what they think is the "popular" bandwagon. I am pretty certain we're going to set this particular British minister straight on whose air space it is.
83 posted on 01/03/2004 8:02:52 PM PST by Libertina (If it moves, tax it. If it doesn't move it's a sitting duck - tax it TWICE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Capt. Tom
Whew! I'm surprised there hasn't been a midair collision with those idiots flying with no radar transponders or lights!
84 posted on 01/03/2004 9:58:44 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: saquin
Here's what I can't understand about this whole spate of cancellations: we know that AQ's MO is multiple strikes. This article seems to confirm that plan. In addition, the AQ threats this time have specifically mentioned strikes that will exceed 9/11.

SO, how is it that cancellation of one flight at a time interrupts their plans? If they were doing multiple, simultaneous strikes, the rest of the plan would just go ahead, right?
85 posted on 01/03/2004 10:29:33 PM PST by ellery
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor
Until the Brits can figure out how people are getting onto the tarmac and lodging themselves unnoticed into landing gear hubs, I don't think we can too highly praise British airport security.

LOL, didn't a fellow make it on an American plane just the other day with a boxcutter?

How did that happen?

86 posted on 01/04/2004 1:18:07 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
We're talking about known flights of "interest" on British Airways. Some wonderful example of the next James Bond must have let the gufus with the box-cutters through security. I wasn't slamming the Brits, just frustrated with their pilots lack of willingness to have armed security on their flights because "someone might get shot." Duh, someone will get shot if you don't have armed guards on there, for sure. Puhleese.
87 posted on 01/04/2004 5:01:49 AM PST by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: saquin
We should also be thinking of another possibility for the nasty people...

There have recently been stories of old jets going missing, especially in Africa.

It wouldn't be too far-fetched for some of these creeps to attach air-to-air missiles to one of these old planes and use them to shoot down an international flight somewhere over the sea. They could then set the transponder of the shooter-plane to show up on radar as the plane it just shot down, and act accordingly. They could then enter the airspace of the destination country unmolested, having switched places with a legitimate plane.

One of the planes which has gone missing was a tanker, I believe... could carry all kinds of nasty things, if not just plain old jet fuel...
88 posted on 01/04/2004 6:21:04 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
I flew to London and then New York with a Swiss Army knife in my travel pouch... forgot all about it.

Went through the x-ray machine...TWICE

When I got the phone call that my father passed away, I went right to the airport and didn't even think about the knife I always have attached to my keychain. I found it just before the x-ray machine, so stuck it in my travel pouch with my loose change, pens, wristwatch and other travel stuff. Got through just fine. Did the same thing in London.

For the way home, I had a clearer head and remembered to pack it in my stowed luggage. I already lost too many Victorinox knives, and don't want to lose my last one!
89 posted on 01/04/2004 6:40:57 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots
Good thing you didn't get caught or we'd have a thread about you here at FR ;-)
90 posted on 01/04/2004 7:07:53 AM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

Comment #91 Removed by Moderator

To: Cboldt
3 weeks ago , my spouse forgot her orkscrew and knitting needles were in her purse. They took them away. It was an International flight to Europe.
92 posted on 01/04/2004 7:18:58 AM PST by americanbychoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: americanbychoice
Yeah, corkscrews are on the forbidden list, but knitting needls are okay (by TSA rules, international carriers may impose different rules). The TSA list was last updated in November, 2003.

TSA Fact Sheet - Permitted and Prohibited Items <-- Link to 320 kB PDF file

93 posted on 01/04/2004 8:53:28 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
You are forgetting something, or you are presuming a few things.
First of all you state it as a fact that the screeners can locate that document.
Second, You are assuming that they can read it.
Thirdly, You believe that they can undertand what they are reading.
Very presumptious of you, if I might say?
:-)
94 posted on 01/04/2004 9:04:11 AM PST by americanbychoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: americanbychoice
Heheheh. Quite presumptuous of me, for certain. Anyway, it is a fact is that the TSA has published rules for traveller's baggage. I'll be first in line to concede that doesn't mean the rules make sense, or that the TSA follows them.
95 posted on 01/04/2004 9:28:35 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson