Skip to comments.
Terror plot to attack US with BA jets
The Sunday Times (UK) ^
| 1/04/03
| Davis Leppard
Posted on 01/03/2004 4:35:03 PM PST by saquin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
1
posted on
01/03/2004 4:35:04 PM PST
by
saquin
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: saquin
The notion that the US can bounce the rest of us into cancelling flights all the time needs to be addressed, said one British minister.You don't have to cancel the flight--you just can't land it in the US. Other than that, fly the damn thing all you want.
On another note, I guess we'll start hearing the leftists praising Bush. After all, he knowingly let 9/11 happen, but stopped this catastrophe in its tracks.
3
posted on
01/03/2004 4:45:10 PM PST
by
randog
(Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
To: saquin
There are signs of tension between London and Washington over the extent to which Britain follows every command from the United States after terror alerts. "The notion that the US can bounce the rest of us into cancelling flights all the time needs to be addressed," said one British minister. I wonder who this British minister is and if he seriously questions the United States' right to control its own airspace?
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
|
Armed Forces - Pacific |
|
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
1
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
To: saquin
I just don't see how anyone can hijack a plane and take over the cockpit again.
Before 9-11, the correct procedure to follow in the event of a hijack was to cooperate with the hijackers and do whatever they said. The worst thing that would happen was you would be forced to land in Cuba or wherever, and you might be stuck on the plane for a day or two while the hijackers tried to negotiate the release of some terrorist out of prison.
After 9-11, you have to assume that any hijacker intends to use the plane as a missle. The correct procedure to follow is for everyone on the plane to beat the crap out of the hijackers. Even if a hijacker manages to get a gun on board, they can't shoot everyone and everyone knows that they are dead of the hijackers aren't stopped.
Also, even if hijackers start executing passengers one at a time, the crew knows not to let them in the cockpit. Instead, the crew will depresurize the plane and start doing dives and rolls to bounce the hijackers off of the walls.
The biggest airplane danger post 9-11 is that terrorists will simply get a bomb on board and blow it up.
To: saquin
It's good to know that we've uncovered this and prevented catastrophe.
7
posted on
01/03/2004 4:53:00 PM PST
by
rs79bm
(Insert Democratic principles and ideals here: .............this space intentionally left blank.....)
To: saquin
By the way I am tracking BA flight 223 right now at this web site.
http://www.cheaptickets.com/trs/cheaptickets/flighttracker/flight_tracker_graphic.xsl
It is presently over Canada, at 40,000 ft. traveling SW at 500 miles per hour.
8
posted on
01/03/2004 4:57:02 PM PST
by
mware
To: saquin
Until the Brits can figure out how people are getting onto the tarmac and lodging themselves unnoticed into landing gear hubs, I don't think we can too highly praise British airport security.
9
posted on
01/03/2004 5:01:50 PM PST
by
Endeavor
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: mr extremist
Get lost!
To: mr extremist
shhhhh!!!!
12
posted on
01/03/2004 5:08:22 PM PST
by
U S Army EOD
(When the EOD technician screws up, he is always the first to notice.)
To: mware
13
posted on
01/03/2004 5:11:44 PM PST
by
ZAKJAN
To: saquin
One of the passengers who failed to turn up was a trained pilot from the Middle East who has since disappeared and cannot be traced... Oh, I'm sure that's just a coincidence...
Note to self - purchase train tickets tomorrow...
To: mware
They said it's expected to land at 9 pm EST.
To: mr extremist
"We've gone from shoe bombs "
==
Richard Reid DID have a shoe bomb, which he was attempting to set off, when overpowered. That's no wild goose chase.
To: Bubba_Leroy
I just don't see how anyone can hijack a plane and take over the cockpit again.
I am surprised that with all the many millions of dollars at the terrorists disposal that they haven't just bought a plane, loaded it with whatever they want, and just fly it into a target.
After all it is a one way trip, and you don't have to worry about landing safely as the drug runners do that fly into this country. -Tom
17
posted on
01/03/2004 5:17:01 PM PST
by
Capt. Tom
(Don't confuse the Bushies with the dumb republicans. - Capt. Tom)
Comment #18 Removed by Moderator
To: Bubba_Leroy
I just don't see how anyone can hijack a plane and take over the cockpit again. Yep, I don't think the passengers will allow this to happen again. I would suspect the hijackers would be beaten to death.
19
posted on
01/03/2004 5:19:08 PM PST
by
Mark17
To: randog
What cheek !
Its our country, Jack. We make the rules.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson