Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldFriend
Allow me to adjust my tinfoil hat for a moment... there, that's better.

I'll just throw this out there, to see what kind of feedback I get...

Would it be to our advantage if Pakistan went nuts for a few days? It would give us an excuse to destroy their nuclear weapons. We could ship a division of soldiers in there to assist in "stabilizing", which could serve as the logistical and security base for more active special forces operations in Pakistan, to find Usama Bin Laden. With the removal of nukes, there would be no more nuclear power play between India and Pakistan and India might then send some troops to Iraq. The unrest could also give India the opportunity to settle this Kashmir thing once and for all.

Just curious on any thoughts on anything above.
5 posted on 01/02/2004 4:59:15 PM PST by Voice in your head ("The secret of Happiness is Freedom, and the secret of Freedom, Courage." - Thucydides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Voice in your head
If India takes control, terrorists will be streaming into Pakistan to fight the Indians.

Isn't it better that the terrorists are flooding Iraq, only?
8 posted on 01/02/2004 5:07:41 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife (Submitting approval for the CAIR COROLLARY to GODWIN'S LAW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Voice in your head
there would be no more nuclear power play between India and Pakistan and India might then send some troops to Iraq.

I think you misunderstand why India's not sending troops to Iraq. It's got very little to do with Pakistan. There are no Indian troops in Iraq because the US liberation/invasion/occupation of Iraq is extremely unpopular in India... and general elections are comign up in October of 2004.

The unrest could also give India the opportunity to settle this Kashmir thing once and for all.

And why do you think a deviation from the status quo will necessarily be good for US national interests? If India could, they'd take over Pakistani Kashmir as well (again, same reason: elections in 2004) and that would only create an even bigger long-term mess.

9 posted on 01/02/2004 5:14:14 PM PST by AM2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Voice in your head
It is one thing to destroy a plant in progress......there is NO safe way to destroy a nuclear facility with bombs at the ready.
10 posted on 01/02/2004 5:14:35 PM PST by OldFriend (Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Voice in your head
We could ship a division of soldiers in there to assist in "stabilizing", which could serve as the logistical and security base for more active special forces operations in Pakistan...

One division in a nation of 150 million doesn't make for "stabilization" -- even if they're invited.

The US interests are far better served if Musharraf can stay alive and keep it in the road.

12 posted on 01/02/2004 5:18:48 PM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson