Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
I think 75% could be high --- however there are different definitions of middle class and it might depend on which is used. I think Limbaugh said about 33% were poor and the rest are middle and upper middle class. Also I think even though many have climbed into the middle class, high single-motherhood makes it a more fragile middle class.
145 posted on 01/02/2004 4:22:56 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: FITZ
Well, I tried to look it up, but most of the census stuff is pdf, which is a hassle. The guy who posted the 75% number is boycotting me.
146 posted on 01/02/2004 4:25:39 PM PST by Huck (This space available--monthly rates---great exposure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

To: FITZ; Huck
I think 75% could be high --- however there are different definitions of middle class and it might depend on which is used.

The problem is that the whole discussion of "class" was gotten going by Marx, and he never really defined his terms very well. The middle class were the people between the "wealthy" and the "working class"

The operational definition I go by goes something like this:


171 posted on 01/02/2004 6:10:59 PM PST by SauronOfMordor (Nine out of the ten voices in my head told me to stay home and clean my guns today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson