What exactly does that mean? Did she say it because she is "OK" with abortion in cases of incest or rape? Does it mean that given todays climate she doesn't see an alternative until the # of unwanted pregnancies go down? Did she say this well before ultrasound and medical technologies prove that "fetuses" are human beings?
I don't really know the answer to this question, but it seems to me that someone who years ago said she was "reluctantly pro-choice" could easily reevaluate that position. I know that I have over the years.
So all I ask is that until she comes straight out and says that as of today, 2004 I am pro-choice, give her a chance.