To: Havoc
Uhhhhh, what always is with my type?
Fascinating?
I could easily return the favor.
I think you could "technically" be right in some of your analysis and still miss some very accurate truths about the Yellowstone situation by maybe a 10's of thousands of miles, so to speak.
But I wouldn't want to argue those specifics. The tedium would be deadly, unfun, to me.
587 posted on
01/04/2004 1:22:16 PM PST by
Quix
(Particularly quite true conspiracies are rarely proven until it's too late to do anything about them)
To: Quix
Just a little punchy. Kinda get that way when people attack with nothing to say. Should be used to it by now; but, having been under the weather this weekend hasn't helped.
As far as being technically right, I am aware I don't know all the factors - neither, apparently, does anyone else. And that is largely the point I've been making.
597 posted on
01/04/2004 7:16:39 PM PST by
Havoc
("Alright; but, that only counts as one..")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson