Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Peach
Good question.

Another article has more detail. Looks like Dubai was an interim port, but the parts were originally from Germany, they just figured it would be too conspicuous to go straight to Libya.

"Officials said the interception of the cargo, worth tens of millions of dollars, was a factor in squeezing Libya to give up its deadliest weapons programs.

The shipment was headed from Dubai in the United Arab Emirates -- an interim transshipment point -- aboard a German ship, the officials said. With help from the German government and the German shipping company, the United States was able to get the freighter, BBC China, diverted to a southern Italian port shortly after it passed through the Suez Canal.

Officials boarded the ship in Italy in early October and seized the cargo, which was not listed on the ship's manifest, U.S. officials said. The craft was less than two days from docking in Libya."

http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/nation/7612880.htm

5 posted on 01/01/2004 2:08:33 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion
This has probably been discussed on another thread and sorry if I missed the analysis.

Question: Discussions started with Libya six months ago. Why are they still looking for nuclear material, given their desire to supposedly give up the program?

On FNC it was discussed that perhaps middle managers didn't know about the discussions. Also theorized that perhaps the program was continuing in case the negotiations broke down.

What are your thoughts on the matter?
9 posted on 01/01/2004 2:13:47 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson