Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Much at Stake for NASA's Mars Rovers
Reuters ^ | 1 January, 2004 | Dan Whitcomb

Posted on 01/01/2004 11:00:29 AM PST by demlosers

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - If the first of two spacecraft bounces onto the surface of Mars on Saturday and unfolds itself into a rock-inspecting rover, NASA scientists hope to begin writing the latest chapter in man's long search for life on the red planet.

But as both U.S. space scientists and their European colleagues can attest, nothing is ever easy when attempting to explore the rugged Martian landscape.

The European Space Agency is still desperately searching for the British-made, $375 million Beagle 2 -- a probe no bigger than an open umbrella -- that was supposed to parachute onto Mars on Christmas Day but never sent a signal to confirm the landing.

NASA is also still smarting from the loss of the Mars Polar Lander and its two probes, which vanished in 1999 just three months after a similar fate suffered by the Mars Climate Orbiter.

In all, NASA says, more than half of all missions to Mars have met with disaster.

"The risk is real, but so is the potential reward of using these advanced rovers to improve our understanding of how planets work," said Ed Weiler, associate administrator for space science at NASA.

This time, NASA officials say, they have gone to great lengths in a bid to get the two golf-cart sized rovers -- nicknamed Spirit and Opportunity -- safely onto the surface of the planet.

"We have done everything we know that could be humanly done to ensure success," said Charles Elachi, director of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, which is managing the Mars Exploration Rover mission. "We have conducted more testing and external reviews for the Mars Exploration Rovers than for any previous interplanetary mission."

BOUNCING ACROSS THE SURFACE

In order to ensure a happy landing, the rovers -- which were launched in June and July -- have been traveling through space tucked inside a folded-up lander, which is wrapped in deflated air bags inside a protective shell.

As each lander drifts toward the surface of Mars by parachute, it will jettison that shell and inflate the air bags, allowing the craft to bounce safely across the bleak landscape for more than half a mile before coming to a stop.

The lander will then spring open and the rover will spend about a week unfolding itself before beginning scanning its surroundings for a safe direction of travel.

Spirit is expected to land on Saturday, and Opportunity three weeks later.

If all goes as planned, the little robots, which are crammed with cameras and a suite of scientific instruments designed to study the geologic record of Mars, may bring mankind one step closer to learning whether life existed -- or still exists, in some form -- on the planet.

Among the assignments laid out by project managers for the rovers will be to search for rocks and soils that could offer clues to past water activity, to investigate landing sites with a high probability of containing evidence of liquid water and to determine if those environments could have sustained life.

"Think of Spirit and Opportunity as robotic field geologists," said Cornell University's Steve Squyres, principal investigator for the science instruments on board, adding that the machines were designed to search out and find the best rocks for study.

"When they get to one they reach out with a robotic arm that has a handful of tools, a microscope, two instruments for identifying what the rock is made of and a grinder for getting to a fresh, unweathered surface inside the rock," he said.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mars; nasa; rover; space

1 posted on 01/01/2004 11:00:30 AM PST by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: demlosers

2 posted on 01/01/2004 11:04:18 AM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is Slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
We should consider this a victory if NASA scientists can continue to crash land space scrap in a relatively small area. How much hardware hve we dumped on Mars? What, 5 or 6 missions? The Martians don't want us, yet we contine to export our technology and crash it into the Martian landscape.
3 posted on 01/01/2004 11:12:28 AM PST by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Very expensive toy. Don't give scientist that kind of money.
4 posted on 01/01/2004 12:23:54 PM PST by observer5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Analyzing Inconsistencies
Here's the part where you come in and claim space agencies are failing on purpose.

(chortle)

5 posted on 01/01/2004 12:25:43 PM PST by Lazamataz (G-d gave us free will. The government took it away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
If mars had no life before... it probably does now... the possiblity of some of this junk from earth being devoid of life from earth is becoming inceasing more remote...
6 posted on 01/01/2004 12:34:57 PM PST by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
The European Space Agency is still desperately searching

< No, they aren't. They are running down the search and rescue checklist that they prepared long ago.

7 posted on 01/01/2004 12:37:19 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
In all, NASA says, more than half of all missions to Mars have met with disaster.

The list of failures is spread evenly among NASA and the Russians, and the Europeans and Japanese have joined the club this year, too. It is a rather odd thing, given the much higher success rates for other interplanetary missions.

8 posted on 01/01/2004 12:39:38 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
It is a rather odd thing

Maybe not. Some of the failures happened during launch. Booster failure. The most annoying failures were during landing, and landing is something not often attempted anywhere--not easy. For the booster failures, we might consider that each launch was a custom rocket, esp. in the upper stages. Not a long track record for any such booster--one each.

9 posted on 01/01/2004 1:03:21 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: demlosers

10 posted on 01/01/2004 10:24:11 PM PST by cartoonistx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The British orbiter is scheduled to take some high-res scans of these unusual features. Pile of natural rock, or something made by something? We may have a lot better idea of what this is in a few weeks.
11 posted on 01/01/2004 10:27:35 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson