[Flightdeck]

'Rumsfeld did not care about mass graves when he openly supported Hussein while Iraq was using chemical weapons against the Iranians and Kurds."

Wrong again, my misinformed friend. The minute Halabjah happened, the US and Rumsfeld condemned Hussein and cut off all support. That doesn't really fit with the liberal version of events, however.

"So, no WMD's"

I just told you the component chemicals of Sarin were found in illegal silkworm missiles. I just told you of Iraqi scientists driving uranium across the Syrian border. Guess what else was on the barge to Libya: uranium enrichment equipment. I suppose the gas masks and atropine injectors found at every Iraqi defensive site were for fun. I'm scared if we don't find the stuff not because of stupid political motivations that drive all democrats, but because everybody KNOWS they were there, even your friend Billy boy Clinton, so they might still be used. If you don't think they had WMD's in Iraq, go take a sip out of the Rhine river. It tested positive for Sarin and Mustard. There's your WMD.

[okie01]

"If you don't think they had WMD's in Iraq, go take a sip out of the Rhine river. It tested positive for Sarin and Mustard. There's your WMD."

That was the Euphrates River, I believe.

Ain't it funny how the libs argue that Saddam had no WMD? Yet, from 1998 thru the end of "major combat operations" in Iraq, they were as convinced as anybody that he had them. And they were even more worried about their presence than conservatives -- to the point of using Saddam's WMD arsenal as a reason not to invade.

The anti-American left would be great entertainment. If they weren't so friggin' dangerous...