Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roses of sharon
Zinni's policy depended entirely on the predictability of a madman with WMD, programs, a history of using them, open support of terrorists, support of the Islamic suicide cultists who have repeatedly threatened the US, Israel, the West, Christians and Jews.

Key word being predictability. We did unto him (and his sons) before he did unto us. Or helped others do unto us. The war on terror focuses on preemptive action thus a huge statement was made to the ArabMuslimTerrorist world when we entered Iraq to put down some rabid dogs. Mad dogs that are considered the norm for rulers in the Arab world. We aim to change that thinking.

223 posted on 01/01/2004 4:27:44 AM PST by dennisw (G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: BDavis
For the benefit of the benighted BDavis -- now, apparently, consigned to ZOTland -- I shall summarize his position on Saddam Hussein, as I understand it:

1. Saddam Hussein was not a "terrorist leader".

2. Nor was Saddam a supporter of terrorism.

3. Nor was he a harborer of terrorists.

Indeed, in BDavis' worldview, poor Saddam might be best characterized as an "innocent bystander". Something like "road kill", crushed by the evil Neocon SUV operated by George W. Bush (with Dick Cheney as the back-seat driver).

Presumably, he would feel the same about Yassir Arafat -- though I didn't get a chance to pose that question to him.

248 posted on 01/01/2004 11:59:55 AM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson