But the psuedo-cons are getting stiffys over Dean who does not support arming pilots or protecting manufacturers and does support extending the AWB.
Rational thinkers can clearly see Dubya as a better choice for RKBA fans, but because Dubya has said he will sign legislation if it passes the Republican controlled House and Senate he is branded as a traitor by the far right nuts.
LOL! So, you’re telling us that if a governor (like Bush, or Clinton, or Dean ;>) is elected President, his 2nd Amendment policies are guaranteed to remain identical to his policies as Governor? Just because he’s “THE SAME GUY?”
Yes Madam Cleo, I think people should be judged by previous behavior and not by what MIGHT happen in the future.
And 'far left fringe party hacks' never answer simple questions:
"Tell us about the so-called 'gun show problem.' According to you, Governor Bush thought 'unlicensed dealers' (a 'fringe left' term for 'law abiding citizens' ;>) should be subjected to 'background check' requirements, and that the 'federal government should solve' the problem. Has President Bush actually done anything in that regard?"
You posted it - answer the question.
"Does a [gun show] problem even exist?"
You posted it, my left fringe friend: answer the question.
As for "previous behavior," that now includes the President's promise to sign an extension of the Clinton 'assault weapons' ban, if Congress sends it to him. You have two choices:
1) Mr. Bush meant what he said, and is therefore no better than Clinton when it comes to the phoney 'assault weapons' issue; or
2) Mr. Bush was 'playing politics,' and said he would sign the bill even though he really wouldn't.
Which is it, "Madam Cleo?" Please be specific.
;>)