How does asking for facts backing up your claim of miniscule odds concerning the life expetancy of 70 - 80 year old supreme court justices relate to Bush's spending?
I am fairly certain I just wanted to know how you defined miniscule. To some it may be 10% others, .00001%. I was just curious.
Of course I expect you to back up this "fact" about as much as you backed up your plot on "Human Resource" costs, which you then called social program spending, but won't go out on a limb to say it is social program spending. Couldn't you have at said it was mislabeled?
whole GOP establishment is out to first marginalize, and then get rid of us. And you agree with that thinking. I'm not sure if you have a turd in your pocket, but this individual part of the GOP (me) is really just out to marginalize you. Not because you make sense, but because you rail against the capitalist pig corporations stepping all over the peasants...
I think you are a lib in sheeps clothing, and a bad liar.
We are 90% of the way down the road to a socialist state with totalitarian tendencies, and I am getting flamed for merely pointing it out.And ostracized by the admin. Even on FR... What the hell is going on in this country? Are you pissed that you couldn't get a night in the Lincoln Bedroom? Now the Administration is out to get you? WHo's next, little green men?
If this is not evidence that there are those that want to silence conservatives PERMANENTLY, I do not know what is. We will be a socialist nation soon... it is only a matter of when.
I don't want to silence conservative, or liberals for that matter. I do like pointing out people who claim to be one thing while their poor stepped on peasant words point to another (hatred of the capitalist pig) leaning.