Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: !1776!
"How miniscule? Care to provide facts for a change?"


Since you refute every single insightful contribution that I am making to this debate, why should I have to defend the fact that BUSH is the biggest spender of all time by every measure known to economics? Bush is fine with this level of spending, and has told all of those who express concern to deal with it, or be cast out as extremists. The whole GOP establishment is out to first marginalize, and then get rid of us. And you agree with that thinking.

I am stating the truth about the disaster that is Bush domestic philosophyy, and all you can do is say that I am a liar?

If you continue to absolutely ignore the dangers that we now face, all in the name of Bush, we have nothing to talk about.


We are 90% of the way down the road to a socialist state with totalitarian tendencies, and I am getting flamed for merely pointing it out.And ostracized by the admin. Even on FR... What the hell is going on in this country?

If this is not evidence that there are those that want to silence conservatives PERMANENTLY, I do not know what is. We will be a socialist nation soon... it is only a matter of when.
311 posted on 12/30/2003 3:30:34 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies ]


To: At _War_With_Liberals
Since you refute every single insightful contribution that I am making to this debate, why should I have to defend the fact that BUSH is the biggest spender of all time by every measure known to economics?

How does asking for facts backing up your claim of miniscule odds concerning the life expetancy of 70 - 80 year old supreme court justices relate to Bush's spending?

I am fairly certain I just wanted to know how you defined miniscule. To some it may be 10% others, .00001%. I was just curious.

Of course I expect you to back up this "fact" about as much as you backed up your plot on "Human Resource" costs, which you then called social program spending, but won't go out on a limb to say it is social program spending. Couldn't you have at said it was mislabeled?

whole GOP establishment is out to first marginalize, and then get rid of us. And you agree with that thinking. I'm not sure if you have a turd in your pocket, but this individual part of the GOP (me) is really just out to marginalize you. Not because you make sense, but because you rail against the capitalist pig corporations stepping all over the peasants...

I think you are a lib in sheeps clothing, and a bad liar.

We are 90% of the way down the road to a socialist state with totalitarian tendencies, and I am getting flamed for merely pointing it out.And ostracized by the admin. Even on FR... What the hell is going on in this country? Are you pissed that you couldn't get a night in the Lincoln Bedroom? Now the Administration is out to get you? WHo's next, little green men?

If this is not evidence that there are those that want to silence conservatives PERMANENTLY, I do not know what is. We will be a socialist nation soon... it is only a matter of when.

I don't want to silence conservative, or liberals for that matter. I do like pointing out people who claim to be one thing while their poor stepped on peasant words point to another (hatred of the capitalist pig) leaning.

369 posted on 12/30/2003 4:18:51 PM PST by !1776!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson