Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith
It makes no difference what the objects of investigation are. If it authorizes warrantless searches, it's unconstitutional.
226 posted on 12/29/2003 11:31:31 AM PST by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
It makes no difference what the objects of investigation are. If it authorizes warrantless searches, it's unconstitutional.

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves..."

229 posted on 12/29/2003 11:43:52 AM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

To: inquest
But we always have allowed it.

Presidents did it, and much more dangerous investigatory practises, under their Article II power to "repel sudden attacks" and to deal with foreign agents.

Until Nixon it was done without any judicial or legislative review.

It was allowed under the previous law this one amended.

The "reasonableness" of national security investigations have been held to a different standard than criminal ones for obvious constitutional and objective reasons- whatever one may think of their wisdom.

233 posted on 12/29/2003 12:35:22 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson