Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jackson Smith
Btw, we shouldn't underestimate this guy (Dean). He may have shitty poll numbers vs Bush now. But so did Reagan vs Carter in '80 at this point. The Carter people wanted Reagan BAD. Everyone thought he was too right-wing. It's all relative. Once Dean wins the nomination and hits the Dem convention, it will all even out.


No offense meant, but were you alive when Carter was President? Carter had so mis-managed this country that anyone the Republicans ran against him would have won. We are just lucky it was President Reagan.

The economy was in the toilet, he let the Iranians walk all over us. The one military action against Iran failed. He was a weak and ineffective President.

Reagan was already well known to most voters. He served as a governor of one of the largest state in the Union. He had support of the party and of the people. He was only "too far right" for those on the left, where everyone to the right of them is too far right.

Few outside of Vermont ever heard of Dean. He was the governor of a small state. And he is "too far left" for those on the left.

I no not thing your comparison holds water.

112 posted on 12/28/2003 6:46:07 AM PST by CIB-173RDABN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson