To: Sir Charles
You could call it "the way things ought to be" if you're into moral principles, or simply one in which common sense is no longer banished from the thoughts of the herd.
"Because we've always done it that way," is reactionary.
"Change for the sake of change," is the ideology of a cancer cell.
Letting one half the population know that we value them through the language we have in common, should be a no brainer.
84 posted on
12/27/2003 2:50:55 PM PST by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
To: gcruse
***"Because we've always done it that way," is reactionary."***
It's only common sense if a better way is not clearly a better way.
***"Change for the sake of change," is the ideology of a cancer cell.***
If a cancer cell had the capacity to hold to an ideology, that may apply. I wouldn't compare a cancer cell to a thinking organism. Besides, I consider the change we're discussing here, a change for the sake of change, and know many women who feel the same.
***Letting one half the population know that we value them through the language we have in common, should be a no brainer.***
We have been doing that for years, until someone suddenly decided that the word "mankind" somehow excludes women, and the only proper term has to evolve to "peoplekind", etc., totally throwing out of kilter meaningful expressions that served us very well since the beginning of history.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson