[Terpfen]

He's also been quick to the sword when Libertarians have called him to defend individual liberty in all personal decisions - immediately asking them if they are on drugs/or in favor legalizing drugs, and etc. right out of the starting gate. Like this statement - which is obviously correct, they DO favor legalization - somehow negates their [more principled] postion on personal liberty relative to the av. Republican's anti-drug war philosophy. (Wm. Buckley - & many other conservatives who publicly support drug legalization - excepted.)

In other words... "I hope they lock him up so I don't have to listen to him insult my party any longer."

[freekitty]

So, don't listen to him. No one is making you.

[4Liberty]

"In other words... 'I hope they lock him up so I don't have to listen to him insult my party any longer.' "

Oh, no - I insist he continue broadcasting. I don't see why he can't broadcast from jail.

Inconsistent Conservatives are the limited-government advocate's best friend.

When they twist themselves into pretzels in an attempt to "make sense" in their support arbitrary gov. regulations of personal conduct - they come across as the dreaded "Moderates" Rush loves to bash.

Let em talk.

At least with the Central Planning Board/Nanny state Dems, you KNOW where they are coming from. There is no pretense, there, of a respect for individual freedom or for private propery rights.