Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SUSSA
"I think a weakened, fragmented, chaotic Iraq, which could happen if this isn't done carefully, is more dangerous in the long run than a contained Saddam is now," he told reporters in 1998. "I don't think these questions have been thought through or answered." It was a warning for which Iraq hawks such as Paul D. Wolfowitz, then an academic and now the No. 2 official at the Pentagon, attacked him in print at the time.

"Now, five years later, Zinni fears it is an outcome toward which U.S.-occupied Iraq may be drifting. Nor does he think the capture of Hussein is likely to make much difference, beyond boosting U.S. troop morale and providing closure for his victims. "Since we've failed thus far to capitalize" on opportunities in Iraq, he says, "I don't have confidence we will do it now. I believe the only way it will work now is for the Iraqis themselves to somehow take charge and turn things around. Our policy, strategy, tactics, et cetera, are still screwed up."

The problem is one of strategy (policy) and tactics (military implementation). The good general is an expert at the latter and not the former. Actually, he simply parrots the excuses the Clinton Administration made for not doing anything about Sadaam. He probably also hates Wolfowitz and anyone else who wants to use force to obviate a threat to both us and Israel.

30 posted on 12/25/2003 3:05:19 PM PST by shrinkermd (i)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: shrinkermd
According to the article, he did have a plan in place to occupy Iraq:

"So early in 1999 he ordered that plans be devised for the possibility of the U.S. military having to occupy Iraq. Under the code name "Desert Crossing," the resulting document called for a nationwide civilian occupation authority, with offices in each of Iraq's 18 provinces. That plan contrasts sharply, he notes, with the reality of the Coalition Provisional Authority, the U.S. occupation power, which for months this year had almost no presence outside Baghdad -- an absence that some Army generals say has increased their burden in Iraq."

32 posted on 12/25/2003 3:09:36 PM PST by KantianBurke (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson