Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Always Right
You're assuming that we know everything

A) Rush has done concerning his addiction. It could be more, it could be less.

B)That the prosecution is investigating only those allegations that have made the news.

C) We don't know if Rush is willing to pay for his crime as minimal or otherwise as it may be. So far he seems to believe that his outing is sufficient punishment.

30 posted on 12/24/2003 8:10:33 AM PST by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: joesbucks
A) Rush has done concerning his addiction. It could be more, it could be less.

Rush has done, what any adictition program would have demanded. More than some too.

B)That the prosecution is investigating only those allegations that have made the news.

That is incorrect.
The prosecution is collecting every shread of potential evidence
in order to determine which crimes they can charge.
This is not investigating a crime, this is collecting the blocks and figuring out what they can build.

C) We don't know if Rush is willing to pay for his crime as minimal or otherwise as it may be. So far he seems to believe that his outing is sufficient punishment.

At most Rush should pay what anyone else would have to "pay", treatment.
The FL courts have a drug treatment intervention system.
Upon completion the case is dropped. Not dismissed, not "not guilty", just plain dropped.
He should not be willing to "pay" one dime or second more than that.

35 posted on 12/24/2003 9:07:19 AM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson