[RightWhale]

I was under the impression that a research office might develop its own model if its grad students were suitably inspired. We had ours, based on the fundamental equations of aerodynamics, Coriolis force, that kind of thing. Seems like they still do that 40 years later. The type of charts they develop seem to be about the same kind of output. It would be hard to fake considering that there are scientists interested in this and they don't put up with bad science. Many would give their eyeteeth to blow holes in a bad model.

[Always Right]

Many would give their eyeteeth to blow holes in a bad model.

LOL, I think you underestimate the level the global warming agenda has infested this 'science'. The only information that is critically attacked and looked at are those that contradict the 'theory'. I have just seen too much from these global warming 'scientist'. I am only an engineer by education, but I find the level of politicalization of this 'science' highly discusting.

[ancient_geezer]

I was under the impression that a research office might develop its own model if its grad students were suitably inspired.

LOL, works so long as it doesn't challenge the UN/IPCC political agenda. Not very inspiring to see ones career in jeopardy before you even get out of the shoot.

Many would give their eyeteeth to blow holes in a bad model.

Not many are willing to fact the heat and loss of funding to accomplish that goal. Who do you figure on getting to fund your research? Or do you figure to make a significant contribution without support and funding?