1 posted on
12/18/2003 11:46:42 AM PST by
Dog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: Dog
I see the 9th Circus is in full beserker/sedition mode today.....
To: Dog
The prisoners need to be freed in time to help Deanie Weenie with his campaign....
125 posted on
12/18/2003 12:26:12 PM PST by
clintonh8r
(You know that KoolAid the RATs are drinking? Well, I'm the guy who's pissing in it.)
To: Dog
So between Al-Queda and Bill Clinton controlling most of the judiciary, why bother fighting the WOT any more?
129 posted on
12/18/2003 12:27:27 PM PST by
Beck_isright
(This tag line edited by the 9th Circuit Court due to offensive political commentary)
To: Dog
This court is wacko.
BTW, you're posting a bunch stories today.... You must be on vacation or something, right?
152 posted on
12/18/2003 12:41:14 PM PST by
b4its2late
(The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
To: Dog
Once again, I'm guessing this is from the 9th Circus.
155 posted on
12/18/2003 12:42:11 PM PST by
Redbob
(this space reserved for witty remarks)
To: Dog
The Padilla ruling, I understand. But how the h*ll do Us courts even claim jurisdiction over foreign citizens being held outside the country??? Their treatment should be solely determined by existing US treaties and agreements between our government and those of the detainees'. Grrrrr.
159 posted on
12/18/2003 12:44:14 PM PST by
ellery
To: Dog
It's time to arrest some judges.
To: Dog
While I am not thrilled with this ruling, since they are foreign nationals captured in wartime circumstances, I'm equally not thrilled with being detained indefinately without charges or a prospect of release. There has to be a medium struck. Squeeze info out of them, then if they have killed a US soldier without being under color of another nations flag, try em for murder -- or let em go.
167 posted on
12/18/2003 12:48:48 PM PST by
Lazamataz
(A poem, by Lazamataz: "What do we do with Saddam, Now that we gottim?")
To: Dog
Why would the 9th District have jurisdiction over Gitmo?
183 posted on
12/18/2003 1:00:15 PM PST by
Tribune7
(David Limbaugh never said his brother had a "nose like a vacuum cleaner")
To: Dog
What's their phone numbers and addresses???
To: Dog
How exactly do these f#$%ing traitors have jurisdiction over something in Cuba when they are on the West Coast ???
195 posted on
12/18/2003 1:09:14 PM PST by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you ought, perform without fail what you resolve.)
To: Dog
198 posted on
12/18/2003 1:14:38 PM PST by
Diogenesis
(If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
To: Dog
Congress can act to remove this matter from federal courts' jurisdiction. Our Ratified Constitution permits Congress shall have this power, not the president, not the courts. Congress alone. Read it.
Congress must get busy or congressmen must get other employment as We the People begin to take back our Republic.
Impeachment and removal of rogue, anti-Constitutional judges must be outsted from office to forfeit their fat salaries, benefits, perks, and status.
To start, the 9th must be purged for their seditious acts under color of law.
202 posted on
12/18/2003 1:16:27 PM PST by
SevenDaysInMay
(Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
To: Dog
206 posted on
12/18/2003 1:22:02 PM PST by
Skooz
(If everyone knew everything about everyone, no one would have anything to do with anyone)
To: Dog
How does the 9th Circuit in California have jurisdiction over a military base in Cuba?
To: Dog
We have become the one thing the Founding Fathers feared most: An unaccountable judicial oligarchy.
To: Dog
At first I thought it just HAD to be a joke!
But the 9th Circus is the joke!
Will they take personal responsibility, if, as a result of access to attorney, the terrorists are able to communicate to other terrorists, and/or won't provide any more intel, and as ultimate result thousands of innocents may die?
To: Dog
The solution is obvious. The judges of the 9th circuit court of appeals are clearly acting on behalf of a terrorist organization. Declare 'em unlawful combatants, and send 'em to Gitmo.
To: Dog
Sorry,(judge muggers)You have NO AUTHORITY over the military nor beyond America's borders.Besides,just who are you going to get to enforce your bogus ruling?
To: Dog
I suggest President Bush put the Gitmo detainees before military tribunals post haste, and have them convicted and immediately executed, in order to prevent the 9th circus from ruling that the detainees should be given federal entitlements, homes in Malibu, and Congressional Medals of Honor.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson