Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(3-judge panel, 9th Circuit) Rules ALL GITMO detainees must have access to an attorney
Fox

Posted on 12/18/2003 11:46:39 AM PST by Dog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 321-323 next last
To: hobbes1
Why not combine the two court cases and state that only terrorists are free to have a political voice close to an election?
121 posted on 12/18/2003 12:23:26 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: T. P. Pole
"How does the 9th circuit even have jurisdiction to make a ruling in this case?"

Brother of a detainee lives in the Central District of California, and is petitioner in the application. [It's all in the opinion]
122 posted on 12/18/2003 12:24:09 PM PST by John Beresford Tipton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Can't say that doesn't sound good. ;-)
123 posted on 12/18/2003 12:24:48 PM PST by StriperSniper (Sending the Ba'thist to the showers! ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Dog
I see the 9th Circus is in full beserker/sedition mode today.....
124 posted on 12/18/2003 12:25:49 PM PST by Viking2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog
The prisoners need to be freed in time to help Deanie Weenie with his campaign....
125 posted on 12/18/2003 12:26:12 PM PST by clintonh8r (You know that KoolAid the RATs are drinking? Well, I'm the guy who's pissing in it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
Lincoln on the Merryman case. "Let Taney (Chief Justice)
enforce his order".
126 posted on 12/18/2003 12:26:40 PM PST by basque69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Dog
If I recall, Reinhardt was also the 9th Circus judge who tried to throw out the California recall election in September.
127 posted on 12/18/2003 12:26:46 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: RonF
Meaningless, except that it's a step along the way for SCOTUS to make the final ruling.

God help us! You can bet that SCOTUS will use it to take away another right from us.

128 posted on 12/18/2003 12:26:46 PM PST by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dog
So between Al-Queda and Bill Clinton controlling most of the judiciary, why bother fighting the WOT any more?
129 posted on 12/18/2003 12:27:27 PM PST by Beck_isright (This tag line edited by the 9th Circuit Court due to offensive political commentary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
On to the supremes.

Boo HISS HISS!

130 posted on 12/18/2003 12:28:25 PM PST by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: guardian_of_liberty
By all means. I'd be honored.
131 posted on 12/18/2003 12:28:29 PM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
"Why don't we just start line'n up & let these scumbag muslim sh*theads just take us out? WTF is going on in this country?"

The same thing that was going on in Spain during the Spanish Inquisition. After finally throwing off the yoke of centuries of Islamic rule, the King & Queen found their country was infiltrated with Muslim "converts", (false converts whose role it was to infiltrate and destroy Spain from within). Hence, the Inquisition to feret out 'heretics' was launched. Of course, 'heretic' was merely the official cover name they used to rid themselves of anti-Spanish infiltrators, spies and subversives. Our judicial system is brimming over with these types of fraudulent "Americans". We need a sort of counter-Inquisition to identify and impeach these subversive "Justices". They are usurping their Constitutional authority and overthrowing our nation from within.

132 posted on 12/18/2003 12:30:11 PM PST by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
On to the supremes.

yeah, now that is comforting.

133 posted on 12/18/2003 12:31:42 PM PST by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
Does the 9th circuit ITSELF lie within the bounds of the United States? It certainly doesn't abide in the bounds of logic, reason, fact, or law.
134 posted on 12/18/2003 12:33:59 PM PST by alancarp (Support Diversity: Hire a Neanderthal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
Sandra Day O'Connor will probably hold that they are entitled to access to U.S. Courts for 20 years and after that it will not be necessary.
135 posted on 12/18/2003 12:34:20 PM PST by hankbrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: omega4412
Unfortunately, the one time a President stood up to the Supreme Court, the Court was right.

The Indian Removal Act was a travesty and a robbery veiled as an Act of Congress. Jackson was wrong.

The Indian Removal Act
The Fugitive Slave Act
Dred Scott

Yeah, the pre Civil War South was real big on individual rights... Bull****!
136 posted on 12/18/2003 12:34:35 PM PST by GreenLanternCorps (WHO DEY! WHO DEY! WHO DEY THINK GONNA BEAT DEM BENGALS!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Abundy; sinkspur
Once they were transported to US soil (GITMO qualifies) they are afforded due-process protections of the Constitution.

Just like the 9th Circus Court you are wrong, wrong, wrong:

GITMO does not qualify as US soil because the lease establishing the base in 1903 and re-established in 1934 upholds Cuban sovereignty of the land the base is on.

The US has neither Territorial Jurisdiction nor Sovereign Jurisdiction, we merely have 'Jurisdiction and Control'--in that we can exercise jurisdiction over crimes occuring ON that land and restrict access to that land.

Now take that tablecloth off your head...

137 posted on 12/18/2003 12:34:41 PM PST by Cogadh na Sith (The Guns of Brixton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Those losers in the 9th never quit!
138 posted on 12/18/2003 12:34:48 PM PST by demlosers (Light weight and flexible - radiation shielding is solved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Yup. I live here and am not worried. If some other circuit had said this, I'd be worried. But not about ANY 9th Circuit opinion.
139 posted on 12/18/2003 12:35:12 PM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke
What the hell? they're not US citizens! They are terrorists and thus aren't covered by the Geneva Accords.

Nor the US Constitution.....

140 posted on 12/18/2003 12:35:38 PM PST by TheBattman (Do it your way - just don't come crying to me when it doesn't work!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 321-323 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson