[onemoreday]

....
....
".....if...."

The only real "if" here is that...

...IF you want the government to "come clean" about 911, you won't get your way, because the majority of people do not care if the government comes clean or not.

Your post is just another way of saying that you you are not of this group.

Yours is a totally irrelevant comment, (within a slew of irrelevant comments) with one objective....

....to preserve your sense of "peace" concerning 911, without taking the chance of finding out something that might "disturb" you.

This does not strike me as an honorable position. I say that because I want the government to "come clean" concerning 911 and you, with your spurious reasoning, support their silence.

Why do you do that?

FREE REPUBLIC was in the vanguard, questioning the OKC report and its subsequent attack on all our freedoms?

Does a mere change of Administration change that much about government that now we "should" accept anything we are told?

That so many do so, and choose "irresponsibility" is just another simple fact of life, I suppose

[GeronL]

...IF you want the government to "come clean" about 911,

Your the one with the problem, you won't accept any other answer than the government failed to do something. In fact you seem to refuse to blame the terrorists. It was the law that the CIA and FBI could not share info, Democrats made that law and they defended it, many of them still want that law to be remade, although it was finally undone after 9-11.

[GeronL]

...IF you want the government to "come clean" about 911,

Your the one with the problem, you won't accept any other answer than the government failed to do something. In fact you seem to refuse to blame the terrorists. It was the law that the CIA and FBI could not share info, Democrats made that law and they defended it, many of them still want that law to be remade, although it was finally undone after 9-11.

[MEGoody]

"Yours is a totally irrelevant comment, (within a slew of irrelevant comments) with one objective."

Nice of you to think you know my objectives better than I do. No arrogance there. LOL

Do you deny that 9/11 wouldn't have happened if Clinton had nabbed Bin Ladden when he had the chance? If so, on what do you base that opinion?

"This does not strike me as an honorable position

I am supposed to care whether it strikes you as an 'honorable position'? You've already shown your arrogance. Arrogant people don't think any position is honorable but theirs.

"I say that because I want the government to "come clean" concerning 911 and you, with your spurious reasoning, support their silence."

If you need to believe that to get through the night, go for it.