To: mac_truck
That sounds like some [a priori] name-calling to me, especially since your side brought Lincoln up in the first place. No, if he had said "it will upset the Ass-Clowns", then it would have been name calling. More accurate, but name calling.
Ha-ha, just kidding.
151 posted on
12/20/2003 11:49:46 AM PST by
Hacksaw
(theocratic Confederate flag waving loyalty oath supporter)
To: Hacksaw
Just curious. Based on your tagline, you support loyalty oaths.
Why?
Communists, the most numerous group of traitors in American history, would have had no trouble taking such an oath.
I suspect Islamists would be willing to do so, on the theory that oath-breaking is OK in the service of Allah.
So what's the point? It seems to me that all you would do is alienate the small percentage of Americans who have religious or ethical objections to taking an oath, and darn few of this group are really a danger to the country.
To: Hacksaw
No, if he had said "it will upset the Ass-Clowns", then it would have been name calling.Funniest post I've ever read... Had to leave the room for a few minutes.
169 posted on
12/21/2003 7:57:17 PM PST by
Gianni
(Some things never change.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson