Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mac_truck
That sounds like some [a priori] name-calling to me, especially since your side brought Lincoln up in the first place.

No, if he had said "it will upset the Ass-Clowns", then it would have been name calling. More accurate, but name calling.

Ha-ha, just kidding.

151 posted on 12/20/2003 11:49:46 AM PST by Hacksaw (theocratic Confederate flag waving loyalty oath supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: Hacksaw
Just curious. Based on your tagline, you support loyalty oaths.

Why?

Communists, the most numerous group of traitors in American history, would have had no trouble taking such an oath.

I suspect Islamists would be willing to do so, on the theory that oath-breaking is OK in the service of Allah.

So what's the point? It seems to me that all you would do is alienate the small percentage of Americans who have religious or ethical objections to taking an oath, and darn few of this group are really a danger to the country.
153 posted on 12/20/2003 12:03:03 PM PST by Restorer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

To: Hacksaw
No, if he had said "it will upset the Ass-Clowns", then it would have been name calling.

Funniest post I've ever read... Had to leave the room for a few minutes.

169 posted on 12/21/2003 7:57:17 PM PST by Gianni (Some things never change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson