Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gianni; mac_truck
I cited the Lincoln as an authority on why the North prosecuted the war.

Lincoln prosecuted a war that was thrust upon him. He had little choice other than bow to southern aggression and turn over forts and facilities that belonged to the U.S. It was the Davis regime that turned to war to settle the matter, not the Lincoln Administration. So the question you should be asking was why slavery was worth launching a war over?

...attempt to generate a coherent (I know, it will be difficult for you)...

It appears from reading our posts that coherence is not the problem here. It's comprehension on your part.

108 posted on 12/19/2003 3:48:49 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
So it's your contention that Lincoln went to war to hold forts in (would-be) foreign territory? Why didn't he just accept the Southern commissioners and negotiate? Were their other USA military outposts in foreign lands prior to the war?
111 posted on 12/19/2003 5:09:25 AM PST by Gianni (Some things never change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
It was the Davis regime that turned to war to settle the matter

"The time for compromise has now passed, and the South is determined to maintain her position, and make all who oppose her smell Southern powder and feel Southern steel" -Jefferson Davis, Feb 16th, 1861

114 posted on 12/19/2003 8:25:32 AM PST by mac_truck (Aide toi et dieu l’aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson