To: danneskjold
Usually the driver/owner as long as it is physically not on a person but in the vehicle. As far as the search who knows,maybe the driver gave permission which brings up another point. If there are 2 or more passengers in the vehicle shouldn't it take the permission of all to search without a warrant? Sounds to me like this is FUBAR and will be challenged at a later date and subsequently be struck down.
32 posted on
12/15/2003 2:34:08 PM PST by
eastforker
(Money is the key to justice,just ask any lawyer.)
To: eastforker; unix
Thanks for the replies...just curious to see what everyone's thoughts were...
To: eastforker
As far as the search who knows,maybe the driver gave permission which brings up another point. If there are 2 or more passengers in the vehicle shouldn't it take the permission of all to search without a warrant? No warrant is needed to search immediately accessable areas of a vehicle. During any detention a Terry search may be performed for the officier's safety without a warrant.
49 posted on
12/15/2003 2:44:29 PM PST by
AdamSelene235
(I always shoot for the moon......sometimes I hit London.- Von Braun)
To: eastforker
. . .will be challenged at a later date and subsequently be struck down. Wasn't this a ruling by the US Supreme Court?
![](http://home.hiwaay.net/~wterrell/william.gif)
92 posted on
12/15/2003 3:45:43 PM PST by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson