To: quidnunc
Too good to be true indeed. The tipoff that this is a fake is that the SAME memo vindicating the Atta-Iraq link also vindicates the Niger-Uranium link. Too improbable.
To: VeritatisSplendor
Maybe, maybe not. If both are true, it is plausible that all were in action at the same time...
To: VeritatisSplendor
"Too good to be true indeed. The tipoff that this is a fake is that the SAME memo vindicating the Atta-Iraq link also vindicates the Niger-Uranium link. Too improbable"
Its genuine alright, a fake memo would also tell how the WMD were divided between Syria and Iran.
180 posted on
12/13/2003 6:38:29 PM PST by
lstanle
To: VeritatisSplendor
Too good to be true indeed. The tipoff that this is a fake is that the SAME memo vindicating the Atta-Iraq link also vindicates the Niger-Uranium link. Too improbable.Good catch! This, by itself, puts me in the disbeliever camp.
This smells like a set-up to embarrass Bush, like the Niger forgery.
(Now to read the rest of the thread)
To: VeritatisSplendor
Too good to be true indeed. The tipoff that this is a fake is that the SAME memo vindicating the Atta-Iraq link also vindicates the Niger-Uranium link. My thoughts as well. One memo conveniently sorts out the links between Mohammed Atta, Abu Nidal, Saddam Hussein, Bashir Assad, and uranium from Niger? Yea, right.
269 posted on
12/13/2003 8:42:17 PM PST by
Toskrin
To: VeritatisSplendor
" Too good to be true indeed. The tipoff that this is a fake is that the SAME memo vindicating the Atta-Iraq link also vindicates the Niger-Uranium link. Too improbable."Bogus Alert?
On second reading, I picked that up, too. Even if the whole Niger uranium story we heard before was accurate, it wasn't that big of a deal and had nothing to do with 9-11. That both were discussed in the same Saddam- Al-Tikriti memo is just a little too cute. Be very skeptical of this.
308 posted on
12/13/2003 10:10:09 PM PST by
cookcounty
(Army vet, Army dad)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson