To: Chad Fairbanks
Disagree. She said she was pinged here by the person saying he did not respect her husband and that he was not noble.
His was not a genuinely honest post. Read it. There is no excuse for it.
I am surprised that you choose to defend a malicious post over a grieving widow.
Rules of a 'forum' do not trump morality and common decency and respect for the departed.
375 posted on
12/13/2003 1:19:09 PM PST by
At _War_With_Liberals
(It's more than a lib/con thing- All 3 branches of govt colluded to limit the 1st amendmenthave been)
To: At _War_With_Liberals
Thank you. I was just getting ready to post similar sentiments, but you did so much more eloquently than I could have. Of couse we have rights of free speech, this is a public forum, etc. But good Lord, can't people VOLUNTARILY stifle their "rights" just for a little while and show some compassion?
380 posted on
12/13/2003 1:24:25 PM PST by
Siouxz
To: At _War_With_Liberals
I wasn't defending anyone over anyone else, but merely commenting on a dishonest debating style.
If you don't agree, that's fine, but it doesn't make me, or anyone else here, a monster.
381 posted on
12/13/2003 1:24:46 PM PST by
Chad Fairbanks
(I don't hear voices. I AM the voices...)
To: At _War_With_Liberals
I agree that was wrong of Dane to ping the wife.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson