Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Darksheare
Actually, using MLRS above 155mm was a wise choice.

Much more yield and longer range.

For close up and personal support, where precision is required, there is nothing better than a M109 self-propelled howitzer with modern electronics.

57 posted on 12/12/2003 12:00:57 PM PST by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Hunble
Yes.
There were some proposing MLRS as a complete replacement for tube artillery.
MLRS can't do Illume, which is rather useful for psychological attacks on the other guy by making him feel visible.
There are other things it can't do, so I never understood the "Get rid of tube artillery" crowd much.
I saw the two systems/disciplines as being complementary and cooperative in their use.
Many of the brass were of the opinion that MLRS and tube artillery were exclusive of each other.
62 posted on 12/12/2003 12:22:57 PM PST by Darksheare (For the crimes of Heresy of thought, Heresy of word, and Heresy of deed, this tagline shall burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson