Furthermore, in cases where the mother moved out after 1 month, the fact that she is already receiving child support from the biological father in no way means that the child should be deprived of the lifestyle the 'temporary daddy' could have provided. Thus, there are women in Seattle who are getting 4+ seperate child support payments for each of their kids, until the kids reach age 18. Here's the kicker.... every guy that she suckers into letting her brood shack up with, gets to donate child support with no limit in sight.
Now lets do some math. 2 kids x $400/month x 4 boyfriends = $3,200/month + gov't benefits. For doing absolutely NOTHING. Nice, huh? On what planet is this considered fair?
I would imagine that most of the conservative princesses on this forum would consider that fair. And if men don't like it, they are "jerks" or "whiners."
The females will just say "Well, I'm not like that." Well guess what, nobody is like that until the become like that ! I'm sure all the single mothers collecting a windfall of child support every month say "Oh, but I'm not like that."
Every woman that has ever destroyed her husband for the rest of his life at one time said "Oh, but I'm not like that."
Like I said in my first post, you can throw out examples of gross unfairness and stores of detroyed lives at some women all day, and you'll just be called a "jerk" or a "whiner." Or they'll talk about how their marriage is filled with wonderfulness.
But the actual issue is never addressed. Reminds me of the way the Dems twisted logic and the English itself when they defended Clinton in '98.
Excuse me, the only person responsible for raising children is the biological or adoptive parents. As a conservative, I don't expect anyone else to pay my( or if I had) kids way other than me and the father.