Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Map Kernow
Apartment/Condos are MULTI-FAMILY buildings subject to regulation. The regulations make good sense to all but the obtuse.

Little House on the Prairie, single-family dwelling, isn't regulated because for one, its overly obtrusive and two, its Pa's responsibility to keep Ma, Laura, Mary and Carrie safe.

But in an apartment building, you may have a neighbor like Cosmos Cramer who lets his Christmas/Festivus tree get dry causing an unreasonable danger to the OTHERS in the building.

The fire marshall doesn't have the time or the desire to go inspect apartments and condos. But the regulation still serves a purpose: Your live tree in your apartment catches fire and damages the whole apartment building - you are criminally as well as civilly liable because you have violated the state fire code. Forget about any insurance coverage - your policy would be null and void.
49 posted on 12/11/2003 4:08:07 AM PST by Diverdogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Diverdogz
Apartment/Condos are MULTI-FAMILY buildings subject to regulation. The regulations make good sense to all but the obtuse.

Little House on the Prairie, single-family dwelling, isn't regulated because for one, its overly obtrusive and two, its Pa's responsibility to keep Ma, Laura, Mary and Carrie safe.

But in an apartment building, you may have a neighbor like Cosmos Cramer who lets his Christmas/Festivus tree get dry causing an unreasonable danger to the OTHERS in the building.

Oh, yeah, I see the distinction now, buddy. All them single occupancy joints are out on the prairie, miles from nowhere. That's why we din' have no fire spreadin' here in California from house t' house two months back. Wouldn't be no way them fellers in Virginia would think it "reasonable"-like to extend the ban to single occupancy thangs. Be real unpopular too, sounds like, since they already done rescinded that there "reasonable" ban on condos and apts, ain't that so?

The fire marshall doesn't have the time or the desire to go inspect apartments and condos. But the regulation still serves a purpose:

Well, now looky here, buddy: it sure look like he don't have time to inspect every dang Jesus joint neither, hunh?

Yet so far this year, Green said, Hampton has cited only two churches for violations. Green would not name the other church cited.

But this ain't gubmint overreaching or anti-religious stuff or nuthin', I plumb agree with chuh, agnostic buddy.

56 posted on 12/11/2003 9:57:33 AM PST by Map Kernow (" 'Hate speech' is just 'speech liberals hate' ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson