Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul Ross
That article is from over two years ago, and there's been a get-well program since then.

Believe it or not, when hardware doesn't perform to spec in tests, it gets reworked and retested until it does.

Still, only a moron stakes the survival of his nation--whichever nation that is--on the combat performance of his nation's ICBM force. They just have not been combat-tested, and the results from "test and evaluation," where the missiles get checked out with a fine-tooth comb, are not encouraging.
99 posted on 12/10/2003 4:08:44 PM PST by Poohbah ("Beware the fury of a patient man" -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Poohbah
The story of the inaccuracy preceded the election in 2000. It was still not fixed as of this story. I personally haven't seen credible evidence that the degradation in performance was fixed. Note range as well as accuracy were impacted. That is not so easily tweaked.
106 posted on 12/10/2003 4:20:46 PM PST by Paul Ross (Reform Islam Now! -- Nuke Mecca!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson