[B Knotts]

Shrillness? For pointing out the obvious?

No. If he had vetoed it, it would not have gone to SCOTUS, because they would not have been able to override the veto.

[Howlin]

because they would not have been able to override the veto.

I think that is wrong; I think they did have the votes to override him. I may be wrong, but I might have even read that on this very thread.

[NYC Republican]

This is out-and-out dictatorship

Sorry... to me, this is a bit shrill... Then again, it's just my opinion.