Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dane
The point is that CFR would not prevent a POLITICAL ad like that from running today, as long as it does not mention a candidate's name.

And forbidding the mention of a candidate's name *is* a restriction on free speech. The most important kind.

YOU get real.
619 posted on 12/10/2003 9:28:26 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 595 | View Replies ]


To: hellinahandcart
The point is that CFR would not prevent a POLITICAL ad like that from running today, as long as it does not mention a candidate's name.

Take a look at your history. There was an uproar over the diasy ad. It only ran once. It was the first "attack" ad. It probably gave Goldwater 5 points, but didn't matter much since he was running behind, 70/30.

635 posted on 12/10/2003 9:32:14 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 619 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson