Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
My solution is to keep trying to get more consevatives in office.

Congratulations. Is someone who ignores the "supreme law of the land" a 'conservative,' or not? Perhaps you consider the issue irrelevant?

It is NOT to sit around and bitch and moan.

Sorry, compadre, but calling a blatantly unconstitutional law 'unconstitutional' hardly qualifies as 'bitching and moaning.' It's a simple recognition of fact...

;>)

571 posted on 12/10/2003 9:15:08 AM PST by Who is John Galt? ("The founders DID NOT campaign nor run ads attacking their opponents" - justshutupandtakeit 12/10/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies ]


To: Who is John Galt?
Perhaps I should restate that.

I'm going to work to put REPUBLICANS in office, rather than sit back and let the Democrats take back the power.

Clear enough.
574 posted on 12/10/2003 9:16:54 AM PST by Howlin (Bush has stolen two things which Democrats believe they own by right: the presidency & the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies ]

To: Who is John Galt?
A fact of what?

your opinion?

576 posted on 12/10/2003 9:17:35 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies ]

To: Who is John Galt?
The defacto First Amendment:

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

581 posted on 12/10/2003 9:18:39 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson