Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VRWC_minion
Yes, of course. It would be constitutional.

No. It wouldn't be. If it was listed that such a thing could be done by government, expressly IN THE CONSTITUTION ITSELF, then it would be Constitutional. That is why there is an Amendment process. Mere passage of a bill into law is NOT rising to the standard of Constitutional Amendment.

Get a grip...

Also, some of you REALLY need to crack a Websters and look up the difference between "infringed", and "regulated".

1,458 posted on 12/10/2003 3:11:04 PM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1455 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse
Jefferson said it first and it still stands as far as I'm concerned: Thomas Jefferson worried that the Courts would overstep their authority and instead of interpreting the law would begin making law....an oligarchy....the rule of few over many.
1,468 posted on 12/10/2003 3:18:52 PM PST by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1458 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson