[RGSpincich]

Her account of her illness and the theatrics that surround it are uncollaborated and sensational. That aside, in her own words she is "a non-right-to-lifer hopelessly liberal Unitarian Universalist feminist". Not suitable for a teaching position, IMO.

http://www.mcgeheezone.com/cgi-bin/mt-comments.cgi?entry_id=1167

[RGSpincich]

Make that uncorroborated.

[TigersEye]

That link is a big ZIP.

[agrace]

Thanks for the link and the simultaneous contradiction to my previous post. :) About the link, a single mention on a message board doesn't seem too indicting to me. And as for her self-description - looks like she would fit in most schools around this country these days, unfortunately.

I am surprised she described herself as a NON right-to-lifer, seems to go against her support of Terri. Typo maybe? Because that is her email address, I checked that too.

[madprof98]

Good Lord! Rev Rus is a liberal in her stands on social justice issues, but she is certainly not pro-abortion. In fact, she encountered a lot of trouble because she was the only one in her Unitarian seminary class who dissented from that church's dogmatic stance in favor of abortion. I suspect she meant that she is not a follower of the conservative right-to-life movement. And she is a "feminist" in the same sense as others in Feminists for Life of America. I can't believe you came up with the "nutcase" diagnosis on such a flimsy basis!