Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Catspaw
I have seen one of the videos, and what Steve said was true! However, not in this case! Unfortunately, these folks believed it to be so, so much that they took lives that should not have been taken, and God forbide this happens again, but with the high handed abuse of emient domain cases happening all over the country in real circumstances and abuses, this is going to happen more!

It appears to me that the wife, just could not accept the fact that the easement was part of her deed. There are reasons for arguement there, but we would have to talk all day on that! LOL

I still wonder at what was meant by the surveys she said was done twice? That does still bother me some. Did the state try and take more than they were given in 1960 or did she misread it or just ignorned it?????
157 posted on 12/12/2003 10:33:27 AM PST by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: countrydummy
Who knows why she thought it was her land--maybe she thought the right of way on the deed "went away" when the property was sold. Maybe she thought that despite the deed, she'd be damned if the state could have "her" property. Maybe she was acting even worse than she did in New Hampshire when it came to someone else taking "her" property (despite it being the state's property). Maybe she's just crank who ended up getting her son and husband involved in killing not one, but two cops over land that wasn't theirs in the first place.

Given the nature of this family, you can expect them to be quite outspoken to the media--and doing so will sink them sure as...well, you know.

158 posted on 12/12/2003 10:58:49 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson