[sauropod]

I read the Bixby letter and in there, they charge that other property owners had their property simply taken and their driveway access blocked just like the Bixbys. I notice that the article that you posted did not refer to that, and seems an attempt to smear the son (even if the New Hampshire charges are true).

I do not condone the violence, but i can understand the rage that the Bixbys must have felt when the utility work would have cut off access to their driveway!!!

The JBT from the SC DOT didn't help matters either, apparently.

Maybe CJ's much vaunted investigative skills can see if their charge about other property owners losing their property in the same way is true? /sarc

[countrydummy]

There is much more to this story than we are being told! Of course the media are going to make the Bixby's out to be the nuts of the world, and I can read between the lines! Not like some that have posted on this thread who have their heads so far up the goberments a**!!!

[Catspaw]

Sauropod, it wasn't their land to begin with. When the previous owner gave/sold the state the right of way to expand the highway back in 1960, the deed to the house was amended at that time and the sale of the right of way to the state was duly noted on the deed when he sold the house to the Bixbys. The deed would have reflected the original legal description of the house, but would have also specifically referenced the legal description of the right of way as an exception to the legal description of the property they bought.