To: Bob J
Brill, Absolutely Brill.
Yes there are two sides, and which do you think the campaign puff piece shows?
And, Yes, there is a completely different set of Nawash background items, and let's see if you can find them!!!!
Next: He is a terrorist's lawyer, not mentioned,not enought space I guess, and it's not likley to sell well to GOP voters, provincial law and order stiffs that they are, so let's just leave that off I suppose.
Most candidate lawyers, esp GOP ones, are former prosecutors, not defenders of al Qaeda suspects.
But as these are all the same to you, AlQeada and OJ, what the heck.
Did you ever read Sami AlArian's website, or Alamoudi's inerviews about what he did for State Dept. Sweetness and light; hate terror; oppose radical Islam. Huge American Flag behind him on the Homepage. Family man. Terrorist. But until they've both lost their 3rd appeal, let's give them the benefit of the doubt and let their ilk,and their attorneys, come into the WH to promote a little Muslim dialogue.
You really have to grow up. This was your most twisted, incoherent and frankly embarassing post to date. And that's saying something! Maybe you should call Ollie and ask him where he is on the Nawash question.
ps. not only did the good folks of that district show him the door, big time, but I would wager that a) he won't be back b) if he is, he won't be getting any more of that cop money. whaddya say?
To: Trollstomper
I have no doubt that there is and has been a concerted effort by the Saudis to get Muslims into the highest parapets of political circles. I have a problem with Norquist being called a traitor and having him accused of knowingly selling this country down the river.
Have you been keeping up?
523 posted on
12/14/2003 11:01:55 PM PST by
Bob J
(www.freerepublic.net www.radiofreerepublic.com...check them out!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson