[Bob J]

You're dodging and spinning 'tooth. Do agree that the government should be able to detain and prosecute individuals based on evidence that they don't have to produce? Isn't it a constitutional right that persons accused of wrong doing have the right the be confronted with the evidence against them?

And the biggie, what do you think Hillary Clinton would do with this power if, God forbid, she was ever elected President?

[hchutch]

A very interesting question.

And certainly deserving of an answer.

But you just might be accused of sabotaging the war effort for questioning the need for that...

[Trollstomper]

Do agree that the government should be able to detain and prosecute individuals based on evidence that they don't have to produce? Isn't it a constitutional right that persons accused of wrong doing have the right the be confronted with the evidence against them?

Wrong on both counts (are you ever right on facts or law?):

1) The evidence is reviewed by a special court, as is the case in the authorization of the collection of same.

2) Illegal aliens, the class we are talking about here, have no such rights, by specific act of Congress in re the establishment of the Immigration Judges.

Next?

3) Apropos of nothing: Are you more worried about fantasy Hillary threats or Sami Al Arian and his pelletized-urea exporting brother-in-law/arms. Quick!