Replies

" does that provide any reason to question the loyalty of the guy's kids?"

Gaffney no place has done so -- that is only Norquist spin to avoid answering what Gaffney DID say and what the record demonstrates was true about the decisions and judgement of youn Khan and Tulbah re who to let in a nd put next to the President. Only as a contextual aside was it also pointed out that perhaps a MITIGATING excuse for these kids bad judgment was the fact of their parents strong active association (which had been discussed in LATIMES, FOX, NYTIMES, San Joes Mercury, etc, long before Gaffney). Of course, one could also observe that the only excuse for such a persistent pattern of bias toward invitees associated of their respective fathers and their ideology (which you could easily research and determin to be way beyond "racist and bigotted") was indeed that this is who they grew up knowing, had phone numbers for, were unable to be objective in screening, etc. If Chelsea Clinton was put in charge of WH outreach , Grover would be the first to throw a fit, doubtless followed by many on this site, full, rather logically, with fear that she would merely be the revloving door stamp for all manner of her parents leftie friends. And anyway, if that then did happen, I doubt anyone would jump up and start calling someone who had predicted it a bunch of names!. Or maybe you would? Consistency being the hobgoblin .......