[VaBthang4]

The M1A1 Abrams MBT in the photo [second from the bottom] was photoshopped in. Notice the rear profile of the MBT as well as the commanders hatch. If the Desert scheme M1 is photoshopped in...then the M-60 combat engineering vehicle directly on it's left was as well.

My job is graphics so save the whining. Show me one photo from a different source showing an M1A1 Abrams anywhere on the WACO property at anytime.

APCs [Bradley] were there but not at that location during the fire. The only thing that close was the M-60 combat engineering vehicle used to introduce CS...or excuse me....massive flaming destructo tyranical Government grenades.

I'm not gonna debate this out...you wont find another image showing an M1A1 Abrams MBT [especially one painted in a desert scheme] at Mt. Carmel.

[OutSpot]

"The M1A1 Abrams MBT in the photo [second from the bottom] was photoshopped in."

That is pure horse $hit

"My job is graphics so save the whining."

What are you a Marine or a graphic artist. Make up your mind?!?!

[OutSpot]

Here is one more source to refute your "theory" that M1A1 Abrams tanks were NOT used at WACO.

WorldNetDaily.com Thursday, October 16, 2003

".....West Point graduate Joseph Mehrten Jr. tells Insight, "Clark had to have knowledge about the plan because there is no way anyone could have gotten combat vehicles off that base without his OK. The M1A1 Abrams armor is classified 'Secret,' and maybe even 'Top Secret,' and if it was deployed as muscle for something like Waco there would have been National Firearms Act weapons issues. Each of these M1A1 Abrams vehicles is armed with a 125-millimeter cannon, a 50-caliber machine gun and two 30-caliber machine guns, which are all very heavily controlled items, requiring controls much like a chain of legal custody. It is of critical importance that such vehicles could not have been moved for use at Waco without Clark's knowledge....."