To: proud American in Canada
I'm not defending child abuse so don't take this the wrong way.
My only concern here is what is the actual speed of these frames? I mean I can easily see where it can be interpreted that the child is being abused, but if these are being taken at 1 second or even .5 second intervals then this very well may be completely innocent.
I would definitely have to have some good technical testimony regarding this video system before I could send someone to jail based on what I've seen here.
9 posted on
12/08/2003 6:53:30 AM PST by
Ispy4u
To: Ispy4u; proud American in Canada
My only concern here is what is the actual speed of these frames? I mean I can easily see where it can be interpreted that the child is being abused, but if these are being taken at 1 second or even .5 second intervals then this very well may be completely innocent. It isn't the speed, it is the position of the head. A 5 month old's neck muscles are not developed enough to support it well enough for the head to be moved like that
10 posted on
12/08/2003 9:54:41 AM PST by
TomB
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson