Can anyone tell me what proposals any of these candidates have offered on the economy? or the War on Terror? or our energy Independence? or trade? or anything else?
All I hear out of these 9 ankle biters is how they would turn over our efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan to the U.N. even though the U.N. was given every possible opportunity to be involved and they refuse. The fact is that the U.N. is a dying organization that will take its rightful place along side the League of Nations. NATO on the other hand is prepared to act with us, and they are right now in Afghanistan. I believe we should drop out of the U.N. and direct the funds we give to the U.N. to NATO.
These democrats believe America shouldn't act in its own interest, they apparently feel that we shouldn't strike out at terrorist where ever they live and strike out at all who harbor them. What will Howard Dean say when he is asked about this? will he say that only the Taliban of Afghanistan should have been confronted, despite the fact that Al-Qaeda operates in several country's on the State Departments terrorist supporting country's? What will Howard Dean or any of the other spineless democrats suggest we do about Iran's ongoing development of Nuclear Weapons and North Korea's willingness to export anything in their arsenal to the highest bidder, including long range missiles capable of delivering Nuclear tipped warheads? Will they entrust our security and our children's security to a feckless bunch of polite, soft spoken diplomats at the U.N. to draft countless resolutions that do little more than amuse those they direct them to, in fact, all these empty threats the U.N. calls Resolutions do is run cover for these murderous dictators.
We need leadership right now far more than we need cooperation from a bunch of stuffed shirts at the U.N. This is something the Democrats can't see or understand and it will be the reason why George W. Bush wins by a landslide next November