Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mel Gibson
IN ninety one did we not promise the saudis we would not invade iraq, isnt that why they didnt protest our going to war with hussein, I seen or read somewhere that the middle east heads of state were concerned , the saudis were afraid we would take over iraqs oil ,if we took the whole country am I right with this.
31 posted on 12/07/2003 7:20:38 AM PST by douglas1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: douglas1
The Brits were furious about the cease-fire. So were the Saudis, Qataris and other Arab Gulf countries. In fact, Newsweek reported British Gulf commander Gen. Sir Peter de la Billiere went "ballistic" and British Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd--who happened to be in Washington--jumped Bush about it immediately, unfortunately to no avail.

No, the Saudis were on our side during Operation Desert Storm. The Arab Gulf countries wanted Saddam Hussein removed since they lived closest to the "loose cannon". Keep in mind, that Saddam Hussein also started the war with Iran. Worrying about taking over Iraqi oil had nothing to do with it. Make no mistake about it, the current war ongoing in Iraq is a result of unfinished business from the first war with Iraq. The Kuwaitis hate Saddam Hussein, he raped their women and destroyed their country, naturally they wanted him out. President Bush (No. 41) and Colin Powell held all the cards and did not take advantage of what they had.

38 posted on 12/07/2003 10:21:13 AM PST by Mel Gibson (Colin Powell is living proof that affirmative action is a failure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson