Skip to comments.
The truth, at last. An Iraqi Colonel: "The West Should Thank God Iraq decided NOT to fight."
Telegraph ^
Posted on 12/06/2003 4:21:49 PM PST by Happy2BMe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: blam
thank you!
21
posted on
12/06/2003 4:45:35 PM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
To: Happy2BMe
The weapons Col Dabbagh was referring to are Saddam Hussein's stocks of chemical and biological warheads. Hmmmm.
The weapons every mental deficient in the U.S. claims never existed?
OK. That aside, the devastation to Iraq that would have resulted would have made Dresden, London or Tokyo look like a picnic.
I am still trying to understand this "we coulda really won if we wanted to" statement.
Typical Muslim bluster and delusion.
22
posted on
12/06/2003 4:47:46 PM PST
by
Publius6961
(40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: Happy2BMe
Col Dabbagh told Mr Coughlin that the 45-minute claim was "100 per cent correct". He added that Saddam had hidden huge stocks of arms, including his chemical and biological munitions, at secret sites across Iraq.
OK General, where are they?
23
posted on
12/06/2003 4:48:00 PM PST
by
Hot Tabasco
(I've dealt with stupid people for over 32 years. Haven't I earned the right to just shoot them?)
To: Happy2BMe
Ok, this all sounds very interesting, but where the HELL are these WMD's NOW? There are Fedayeen & former Bathist dudes running around Iraq attacking our troops, the UN, innocent Iraqi's, but they haven't used the WMD because they don't want civilians to die? I'm confused.
24
posted on
12/06/2003 4:48:50 PM PST
by
Ragirl
To: blam
"Col al-Dabbagh said he had no idea what became of the weapons he was describing. He believed the weapons would not be found until Saddam was caught or killed, as people would then feel freer to speak about them." Given the unimaginable terror Saddam has reigned over Iraq for the past twenty five years, I find this statement believeable.
As I said, once one apple falls from the tree, a little more shaking, a whole lot more apples.
25
posted on
12/06/2003 4:49:44 PM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
To: Happy2BMe
"Isn't this enough evidence to prove Saddam had WMD?" It would be, if the good Colonel would be so kind as to show us where the giant stockpiles of WMD are.
26
posted on
12/06/2003 4:51:07 PM PST
by
Voice in your head
("The secret of Happiness is Freedom, and the secret of Freedom, Courage." - Thucydides)
To: Ragirl
"There are Fedayeen & former Bathist dudes running around Iraq attacking our troops, the UN, innocent Iraqi's, but they haven't used the WMD because they don't want civilians to die?" Until more is substantiated from this former Iraqi officer's testimony, all we have to go on is conjecture.
It could be however, that the specially trained forces and personal protective equipment necessary to deploy what WMDs are left remaining are few and scarce.
Perhaps they don't want to kill themselves trying to kill us?
27
posted on
12/06/2003 4:52:27 PM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
To: Happy2BMe
I do not believe Tony Blair will pay a huge price for anything, He stood tall when standing tall was a necessity. When the final story is told, once again, the left wing wussies who would rather get on their knees and bow at the feet of evil, rather than to confront it, will be sidelined by those who understand the real meaning of freedom and why it must be defended.
No one in this conflict will die in vein as long as we finish what we started, to cut and run like Bill Clinton did in Mogadishu would betray those who paid the ultimate price in removing Saddam and liberating 24 million Iraqi's
28
posted on
12/06/2003 4:53:04 PM PST
by
MJY1288
(The Democrats Have Reached Rock Bottom and The Digging Continues)
To: demlosers
"Its buried out in the middle of nowhere." Don't laugh too hard!
The Iraqis managed to bury entire wings of French Mirage jets undergound without being detected.
We'er still finding whole mirages buried in the ground.
29
posted on
12/06/2003 4:54:27 PM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
To: Hot Tabasco
Well, if they can hide an air squadron in the sand........
30
posted on
12/06/2003 4:59:57 PM PST
by
txhurl
To: Happy2BMe
Not to Peace TURDS. They not only have to have it found, in vast quantities, but verified by someone they trust; say like North Korea, or Cuba, or China.
Oh yeah, it would also help if a couple of the inspectors during scientific analysis died. Then they could blame us for not properly safeguarding it.
31
posted on
12/06/2003 5:00:28 PM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: Happy2BMe
Isn't this enough.........The simple short answer is NO!!
However a longer version would be this: If you were a DEMOCRAT POTUS (Bill Clinton etc) the ANSWER would be a RESOUNDING & DEFINITIVE, PROOF BEYOND any DOUBT..... YES!!
If you are a Republican POTUS then the ONLY way to PROVE the existence of WMD is for MASSIVE US Casualties to result from a NBC attack!!
32
posted on
12/06/2003 5:00:33 PM PST
by
PISANO
(God Bless our Troops........They will not TIRE - They will not FALTER - They will not FAIL!!!!!)
To: demlosers
" Its buried out in the middle of nowhere."
Amazingly,NBC Nightly News had an exclusive on this tonight.Very credible report, said the feyadeen have hidden the WMD in the desert.Only the capture of Saddam will free those in the know,to talk.And tomorrow,on MTP-Russert will allow HC to spew that Bush lied about WMD, ignoring the NBC exclusive.
To: Happy2BMe; Alamo-Girl; onyx; SpookBrat; Republican Wildcat; Howlin; dixiechick2000; SusanUSA; ...
34
posted on
12/06/2003 5:21:23 PM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(George Soros "MINOB": http://richard.meek.home.comcast.net/SorosRatsA.JPG)
To: billhilly
Have you ever heard of Ollie North?
35
posted on
12/06/2003 5:24:44 PM PST
by
U S Army EOD
(When the EOD technician screws up, he is always the first to notice.)
To: blam; TurtleTrap
Here's a question...
Are Kay's inspector's even looking for chem/bio weapons in the form of small rocket-propelled grenades? Or are they looking for "big" bombs and artillery shells?
Another question...were any fired...and did they work?
36
posted on
12/06/2003 5:35:20 PM PST
by
Shermy
(The internet...give it a drive)
To: MeeknMing
I think that the fact that we captured mass stockpiles of conventional munitions in forward areas and the fact that there were chemical protection equipment in these stockpiles could only mean one thing.
They had intended to at least stop or slow our attack before it got to Bagdad. They were hoping that we would stop, consolidate our gain, and regroup before attacking again. This is basically the way the Russians fight and is the doctrine the Iraqis would understand. They don't understand the idea of continuing the attack such as we did.
Had we stopped and consolidated, there is no doubt in my mind that they would have used chemical weapons on us. Our tactics never presented a massed target to them plus they didn't have time to fire them. The 45 mins is based on, your lauchers and ammunition are already in place. They never got a chance to do that.
I base this on the fact that they knew they would not be resupplied with ammo therefore would not abandon it if at all possible. Also the protective chemical equipment was in those areas of the large conventional ammo stockpiles. Now they knew we weren't going to use chemical weapons, so who do you think they thought were going to use them?
37
posted on
12/06/2003 5:36:43 PM PST
by
U S Army EOD
(When the EOD technician screws up, he is always the first to notice.)
To: Shermy
"Another question...were any fired...and did they work?" Sorry, can't answer any of your questions.
38
posted on
12/06/2003 5:37:13 PM PST
by
blam
To: PISANO
"If you are a Republican POTUS then the ONLY way to PROVE the existence of WMD is for MASSIVE US Casualties to result from a NBC attack!!" Have you had your nightcap yet chief?
39
posted on
12/06/2003 5:42:02 PM PST
by
Happy2BMe
(2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
To: U S Army EOD
You know, if your post were disseminated, we could stop this 'where's the WMD' BS forever.
40
posted on
12/06/2003 5:42:06 PM PST
by
txhurl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson