Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RWR8189
"Even if there's only a 10 percent chance that Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden would cooperate, the question is whether that's an acceptable level of risk," Bayh told me.

What is an acceptable level of risk to them??

3 posted on 12/05/2003 11:09:12 PM PST by Mo1 (House Work, If you do it right , will kill you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mo1
"What is an acceptable level of risk to them??"

I would like to think that it would be zero risk, but I have a feeling I'm gonna be disappointed.
10 posted on 12/06/2003 12:29:15 AM PST by SuperVillain ("It just goes to show you that baseball doesn't make any sense" - Ron Darling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mo1
What is an acceptable level of risk to them??
These people see no risk. They see no threat. We all have RAT friends. What do your RAT friends say to you? Mine said to me, back in the 80s, that Reagan was the biggest threat to world peace. And they believed it. Even as Reagan was taking down the Evil Empire.

And today they say the same thing about Bush. And they truly believe it. My only explanation is that there is some weird New England anti-war meme that spreads through the population like a virus. Most of us are immune to it, but some of our fellow citizens are badly infected and remain so for their entire lives.

14 posted on 12/06/2003 4:54:08 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson