To: Jeff Chandler
That part of the WOD is difficult. How can a person, legally purchase alcohol, take it home and get "high" off of it and yet be a criminal for getting a similar "high" off of marijuana. I think therein lies the failure of the system.
To: ican'tbelieveit
Pot to booze is not a good comparison, because the effects of pot linger for days. Pills might be a better comparison.
We need to ask ourselves: do we want more addiction, which legalization would lead to? Don't get me wrong, I don't think we should treat addicts as criminals. I just think we should be very circumspect before we give tacit approval to life-destroying substances. I've been debating the WOD for decades. I see the injustice of the current laws, but I've seen loved ones destroy their lives with booze, and with pot. Total legalization would increase the destruction. There has to be a more humane legal approach to drugs, though.
It's one of the few subjects I'm truly ambivalent on.
97 posted on
12/05/2003 12:04:25 AM PST by
Jeff Chandler
(Chilling Effect-1, Global Warming-0)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson