Skip to comments.
Porn virus targets spam stoppers (Don't look at the pictures, sonny!)
BBC News ^
Posted on 12/04/2003 5:49:22 PM PST by Happy2BMe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: Keith in Iowa
I'm a computer security consultant. I have a friend that runs a large ISP and tracks spammers for a living. It is trivial to spoof those headers. If you're relying on headers then you're getting bad information...guaranteed.
To: alwayzright
>>I'm a computer security consultant. I have a friend that runs a large ISP and tracks spammers for a living. It is trivial to spoof those headers. If you're relying on headers then you're getting bad information...guaranteed.
I've used headers to track and kill sources of spam - so don't tell me it can't be done, becuase I know otherwise.
22
posted on
12/05/2003 12:22:37 PM PST
by
Keith in Iowa
(Tag line produced using 100% post-consumer recycled ethernet packets,)
To: templar
templar, You are joking right? You did not really buy Life Insurance via a spam note, did you?
To: Keith in Iowa
>> I've used headers to track and kill sources of spam - so don't tell me it can't be done, becuase I know otherwise.
Define "kill sources of spam." I'm sorry but headers are nothing to spoof. Do a google search. Not to mention the fact that most spammers use relays in countries that don't give a crap about spam, so I am highly doubtful that you did anything more than annoy someone running an open relay.
To: Yeti
I like Eudora, personally. Same here. Been using it since '95.
25
posted on
12/05/2003 12:44:35 PM PST
by
Tree of Liberty
(I can get you a toe by 3 o'clock this afternoon... WITH nail polish)
To: devane617
templar, You are joking right? You did not really buy Life Insurance via a spam note, did you? Next you'll be saying my Nigerian investment partner is a scam.
26
posted on
12/05/2003 12:45:03 PM PST
by
Hacksaw
(theocratic Confederate flag waver)
To: alwayzright
>>Define "kill sources of spam." <<
Is an ISP terminating service to someone good enough for you?
27
posted on
12/05/2003 12:47:23 PM PST
by
Keith in Iowa
(Tag line produced using 100% post-consumer recycled ethernet packets,)
To: Keith in Iowa
That doesn't kill a source of spam. You probably just got an open relay shut off. I assure you it takes much more to stop a spammer. If you're interested enough to go that far, do some research on the Internet. Tracking spammers is fascinating because it never ends. The spammers always find some new way to progagate their trash.
To: alwayzright
Let me say it in plain, simple English: Yes - SOURCES of spam have been killed as a result of tracing headers. I have personal knowledge of ISPs applying their terms of service agreements and terminating services to customers for violations of the TOS agreements. Need I explain any more?
29
posted on
12/05/2003 12:55:10 PM PST
by
Keith in Iowa
(Tag line produced using 100% post-consumer recycled ethernet packets,)
To: Happy2BMe
My latest adventures in spam have MY name in the "From" area. It's creative and innovative on the sender's part but I just delete them with the rest.
Why would spammers think that I would be fooled by a mail from myself and that anyone would BUY their krap anyway?
30
posted on
12/05/2003 1:02:22 PM PST
by
arasina
(I can't believe I said that.)
To: devane617
You are joking right?Not joking. 10 year level term for 100,000. Into third year in January. Through Tansamerica Life. The spam wasn't from Transamerica, it was a canvas from an independant agent. He offered me several choices to choose from.
I have a friend who refinanced his house as a result of a spam e-mail. Said he got a significantly better deal than any of the companies he had called directly. Spam is like any other solicitation. Some are good deals, others are bad deals, most is unrelated to anything I am interested in but I just delete those without bothering to read them.
31
posted on
12/05/2003 5:38:18 PM PST
by
templar
To: Keith in Iowa
I honestly don't think that you're understanding me. So why don't you explain to me, in technical terms, exactly how you tracked this spammer down using email headers. And then I will explain to you, in technical terms, how all you did was close an open relay that spammers use to forward their messages through.
To: alwayzright
How hard is it? You look at an IP address source, do a whois, contact people - they verify crapola is flowing from said source. They kill said source. Simple enough for you?
To: alwayzright
And, before you pop off any more about closing open relays...I'm talking about instances where sysadmins verified that no open relays are/were involved.
To: Keith in Iowa
>> How hard is it? You look at an IP address source, do a whois, contact people - they verify crapola is flowing from said source. They kill said source. Simple enough for you?
Exactly. THE IP SOURCE IS SPOOFED!!!!!! Do a google search!!! There is TONS of FREE software out there to let you do this. So you call up the ISP of the IP address and tell them you're getting spam from the IP. The ISP shuts off the service of Joe User who has no idea what is going on. Simple enough for YOU? That's why this is a bad idea, because there is no way to tell when you've reached the ACTUAL source of the spam.
To: Keith in Iowa
>> And, before you pop off any more about closing open relays...I'm talking about instances where sysadmins verified that no open relays are/were involved.
It is practically impossible to verify that no open relays were involved...not to mention unheard of. Spammers ALWAYS use open relays because they don't want to get caught. If you have actually received spam that was not routed through an open relay then you must have received spam from the dumbest, poorest spammer on the Internet.
To: alwayzright
>> THE IP SOURCE IS SPOOFED!!!!!
I know spoofing is widespread. I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about specific instances where sysadmins have verified the source(s) of spam, and acted upon violations of TOS, and terminated service. Why is that so hard for you to understand?
To: alwayzright
>> It is practically impossible to verify that no open relays were involved.
How? I's pretty damn easy when you personally know the people.
To: Happy2BMe
I only get 5 to 15 a day and try to filter them with Eudora Lite. I've noticed more and more showing overseas addresses. I know people that get hundreds of spams a week. I'm wondering if the new Eudora 6 has more features for blocking spam...
39
posted on
12/05/2003 8:07:17 PM PST
by
tubebender
(We've been married 47 years and she still doesn't put the toilet seat up for me...)
To: Sabertooth
I have used MS Outlook express for over a year now. I have received only one e-mail from someone I wasn't familiar with. I also have a hotmail address that I use as my e-mail address when registering for anything over the internet.
My hotmail account constantly receives spam...I only recieve mail from friends and relatives in my outlook account. That's my answer to spam. For those who must publicize their e-mail account...I have no answer.
40
posted on
12/05/2003 8:20:13 PM PST
by
dubyagee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson